Friday, June 28, 2013

Destroying the Society They Think They're Protecting

The leaders of this Colorado town said they had to call off their parade because too many people wanted to march carrying guns. I think it's really because they didn't want to be seen with so many men who have small penises.

12 comments:

free0352 said...

Did civil rights leaders who marched for black voting rights simply have small penises?

I think liberals have small penises, because they are so easily intimidated by guns.

Tbe bottom line is the civil rights of the citizens of Colorado are being genuinely violated. They have every right to make a statement by marching with the guns their government is trying to limit or ban.

What other rights when exercised are a result of tiny genitalia?

Is a man in a jury trial just a guy with a micro dick? If he was a real man, he wouldn't need that trial. He'd just go to jail and rape some inmates.

When you exercise your 1st Amendment rights by writing this blog, is it secretly because you are hung like an infant?

If you vote you're a limp dick.

That is what you are really saying.

jim marquis said...

LOL, we have liftoff!!!

Sorry, Free...it was a bad joke but I just couldn't help myself.

free0352 said...

I think its a valid point. You guys are always trying to imply if you own a gun for self defense you live in some kind of state of fear.

Yet its you anti-gunners who are pissing your pants over guns.

jim marquis said...

No, I believe owning a gun for self-defense is actually very reasonable. My son has one. We just differ on the amount of firepower that people need or how much firepower people can get without a background check being done.

I do have a problem with guys walking around with exposed weapons so they can feel like a big man (or woman), making everybody near them nervous.

free0352 said...

How ignorant. Guess what, you go to a gun show and buy from a dealer, you get a background check.

What you're saying, is that in effect we should ban peer to peer transfer/sale of firearms. Those are the only sales not run.

As for how much "firepower" someone would need-

Frankly, how on earth would you know? What experience can you draw from?

And as for open carry, there you go. Your knees knocking over nothing. Frankly, its your fear, not ours.

If you don't like guns, don't buy one.

free0352 said...

If you wouldn't ban a cop from having it, you shouldn't ban a citizen from having it.

They have to fight the same bad guys.

jim marquis said...

I guarantee a lot of cops aren't crazy about some of the folks who have arsenals at home.

free0352 said...

I used to be a cop, and I'm pro gun too.

free0352 said...

Looks like I'm not alone there either.

The majority of respondents — 71 percent — say a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of some semi-automatics would have no effect on reducing violent crime. However, more than 20 percent say any ban would actually have a negative effect on reducing violent crime. Just over 7 percent took the opposite stance, saying they believe a ban would have a moderate to significant effect.

free0352 said...

This graphic really says it all.

They asked 15000 cops what they thought about gun control.

I don't think you're assertion cops are for it is even remotely in the ball park. In fact, its to polar opposite of right. Just look at the graph.

What cops said, was not only do they not support gun control, they hate it and would not enforce the law. I know I wouldn't.

Snave said...

Policemen who won't support the law. Now that is an interesting concept. Sounds like we all need to have arsenals to protect ourselves from the police, then?

free0352 said...

Nah, you don't need an arsenal, you need a good, solid repeating semi-auto rifle, a 12 gage shotgun, a fullsized pistol and a compact pistol. That isn't an arsenal ;)

In all seriousness, if you're talking about the need to deter those in government who need deterrence, we're already doing a great job thanks.

Just don't get in our way of doing that please.